What Masculinity Means?
The unpicking of the established process to create a new concept.
Summary: This project spanned across the year of 2021-2022, unpicking and designing a methodology for a complex and wicked question: What is masculinity?
This project, as well as being autoethnographic, is participatory and human centric in design. Resulting in a methodology of “The Wall”, which can be applied to any human centric wicked questions, the design of Artifacts and authentic images that do not feed back into stereotypes of media masculinity.
This process of unpicking the tacit to the design of methodology, has been guest lectured by yours truly, to MA Design and Fine Art Students at Chester University.
Fig. 9
Come As You Are was successful in creating a new design process from the product to the participatory, however this project has become a success in its own right and is continuing separately from this design process investigation into a collaboration. The next step is to meet with the participants with a view of planning how showcase this project.
fig. 10
What do you think?
To take this process from the feminine portrait to the masculine I observed the first two steps in the process: Step One - Brand & Ethos. Step Two - prompt a response.
Although there are male followers on both Instagram and Facebook, the percentage is far less (fig. 11 & 12).
Fig. 11 & 12
The social platform Instagram holds the majority of male followers, with Instagram stories reaching the same number of accounts (on average 200 per post) and is a feature for viewers to engage with, I resolved this would be the best place to pose the question “What does masculinity mean to you?”. I shared each response with an image from the paper project back within the Instagram stories to continue conversation (fig. 13).
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
From the Come As You Are design process of conversation before the photo session and applying taxology during the session, words such as: vulnerability, uniform (the clothes you wear), language (how you talk), arrogance, aggression, and femininity.
Common body language themes began to appear such as; “show me arrogance” resulted in a chin up (fig. 21 & 22) and “show me aggression” resulted in chin down (fig. 23 & 24).
Fig. 21, 22, 23 and 24
Fig. 20
Conclusion.
The process within these small investigations highlights the unconscious ways in which I process design thinking. Once it became apparent, through research, that the question of “what is masculinity?” was too great a question to tackle, I understood that a design to establish what masculinity means to an individual, through participatory portrait photography can be reached.
Come as You Are is a successful project in its own right, it was initially an action research investigation in creating a process step from the product into the participation. I underestimated the established Red Shoe brand and ethos in attracting many participants within this project, and as such less time remained for other smaller investigations.
The design process was viewed as a linear process, looking at steps one and two and creating an investigation to unpick this part before moving onto the next step in the process. Upon reflection, I would bypass these first few steps in the process and set to work at creating investigations around the end result, which sounds misguided, however, without showcasing why and how masculinity was to be photographed, this made it difficult in gaining participants and fundamental time was lost in action research. The investigations revealed that without displaying artifacts there are no participants, however participants are required to display the artifact. In retrospect I would have spent more time within the photo shoots investigations by asking friends to partake, with increased time spent creating and photographing the taxology and delivering these results to create ethos, branding and participation.
Despite the retrospect, the process within these investigations have resulted in these conclusions and moving forward I can implement these new methodologies, while planning the next form of investigations.
Bibliography
Berger, J. (1972). Ways of Seeing. London, United Kingdom: Penguin Books Ltd.
Creighton, G., Brussoni, M., Oliffe, J., & Olsen, L. (2015). Fathers on Child’s play: Urban and rural Canadian perspectives. Men and Masculinities, 18(5), 559-580. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X14562610
de Boise, S., & Hearn, J. (2017). Are men getting more emotional? critical sociological perspectives on men, masculinities and emotions. The Sociological Review (Keele), 65(4), 779-796. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026116686500
Fong Gomez, S., Marshall, C., Jackson, R., & Allen, A. (2020). The portrait project: Content and process of identity development among young men of color in east oakland. Journal of Adolescent Research, 35(3), 341-367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558420908801
Griffin, G. male gaze (2021). In A Dictionary of Gender Studies: Oxford University Press. Retrieved 9 Feb. 2021, from https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780191834837.001.0001/acref-9780191834837-e-242. Jansen, C. (2017).
Girl on girl: Art and photography in the age of the female gaze. London, United Kingdom: Laurence King Publishing.
Levant, R. F., & Pryor, S. (2002). The tough standard: The hard truths about masculinity and violence. Oxford University Press.
Levant, R. F., & Wong, Y. J. (2017). The psychology of men and masculinities. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000023-000
Scott A. Lukas (2002) The Gender Ads. Retrieved from http://www.genderads.com/
Sutton-Brown, C. A. (2014). Photovoice: A methodological guide. Photography & Culture, 7(2), 169-185. https://doi.org/10.2752/175145214X13999922103165
Vokey, M., Tefft, B., & Tysiaczny, C. (2013). An analysis of hyper-masculinity in magazine advertisements. Sex Roles, 68(9-10), 562-576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0268-1 Zimbardo, P. (2011, March).